2011年5月14日土曜日

Apple's Next Phone Will Be The iPhone "4S," Says Analyst

Apple's next iPhone will be called the iPhone 4S, not the iPhone 5,
according to "industry checks" by Jefferies analyst Peter Misek.

Misek put out a note on the next iPhone today, and said, it will "include
minor cosmetic changes, better cameras, A5 dual-core processor, and HSPA+
support."

Apple wanted to add a chipset to support high speed 4G wireless networks,
but the chipsets weren't going to be ready in time.

Because the 4G chips weren't ready, Apple is going with the minor update to
the iPhone 4.

Misek also revealed the next version of the phone will work with Sprint,
T-Mobile, and China Mobile.

Ford to Make Cars Smarter With Google Prediction

Ford Motor Co. wants to use the Google Prediction API to predict driver
behavior and use that input to make cars perform better.

The company's goal is to use cloud-based storage and computing to collect
and process information about how drivers use their vehicles. Accessing
those resources over a wireless network, a vehicle could automatically
change how it performs, according to Ford.

The Google Prediction API, released last year by Google Labs, is designed
for giving an application information about past user actions so it can
better predict future behavior. The API (application programming interface)
uses pattern-matching and machine learning and is designed to be simple to
use, according to Google. On its information page about the API, Google said
it could help a website recommend products to regular visitors, detect what
a user would consider spam e-mail, and predict how much a user would be
likely to spend on a given day.

Ford is extending this technology from the Web to the road. On Tuesday at
the Google I/O conference in San Francisco, Ford will present one conceptual
case for the use of this technology in a plug-in hybrid electric vehicle. If
the owner started the car on a weekday morning, the car could use its recent
driving history to predict that this will be a trip to the office. An
automated voice would ask the driver to confirm this, and if the driver
said, "Yes," the car could prepare to handle the route to the office
intelligently.

In the example presented at Google I/O, the hybrid could favor its gasoline
engine on the first part of the trip to set aside battery power for an
electric-only section of road that it knew was coming up later on the route.
But knowledge about location, routes and driver behavior could also help a
car in other ways, according to Ryan McGee, a technical expert at Ford. For
example, the vehicle could shift to full electric power while close to the
driver's home, in order to reduce noise and pollution. A car with access to
the predictive tool could also use different techniques to save energy for
later, depending on an individual's style of driving, McGee said.

A large amount of information about a driver's preferences and driving
behavior could be stored in a profile in the cloud and then accessed when
that driver got in the car, according to Ford. The company emphasized that
drivers would have to opt in to such a service so none of this data would be
collected unless they agreed to it. The profile would also be encrypted to
protect the information from unauthorized use.

Ford doesn't expect smarter cars to start changing drivers' behavior by
throttling back their acceleration or limiting their speed to save energy,
McGee said. Rather, the idea is to help the car program itself to adapt to
each driver's style.

The company won't discuss any plans for car features or services based on
this technology, and due to logistical issues, its software demonstration at
Google I/O doesn't even use an actual vehicle. But McGee said products based
on this type of intelligence might reach the market some time after 2015.

Samsung Announces 10-Inch "Retina" Display for Tablets

The next generation of tablets could have ultra-sharp "retina" displays if
Samsung has anything to say about it. The Korean electronics giant plans to
demonstrate a high-resolution LCD screen with a pixel density of 300 dpi and
with a 40 percent power savings over current models.

The screen is based on a display technology called PenTile, which adds a
fourth "color" to the traditional trio of colors in LCD screens, red, green,
and blue (not to be confused with Sharp's QuadPixel tech, which adds
yellow). The fourth color is white, which makes the panel much more
efficient. Typical LCDs use a combination of the colored pixels to produce
white light, but the PenTile panel primarily uses the white pixels for this.
Since a large chunk of image content is white or light colors, less energy
is needed overall.

The other advantage to PenTile tech is that it needs fewer pixels to produce
images at the same resolution. Or, put another way, a panel with the same
number of pixels as a traditional screen will have higher resolution. The
screen, which Samsung will demo next week at a trade show in Los Angeles,
has a resolution of 2560x1600 and measures 10.1 inches diagonal, giving it a
pixel density of 300 dpi. That would appear to qualify it as a "retina"
display, though the term itself, popularized by the Apple iPhone 4, has no
scientific definition.

The PenTile screen overcomes at least one of the issues for making devices
with higher-resolution screens: battery life. The biggest drain on the
battery of any tablet is the screen, and the PenTile screen cranks up
resolution while actually increasing energy savings by 40 percent. Of
course, the processor in the device with the high-res screen would need to
drive graphics at the higher resolution, which also drains power, so the
actual energy savings wouldn't be as dramatic as that.

PenTile RGBW screens are already in use, most notably in the Motorola Atrix,
but this display shows off how beneficial they can be for tablets, where
those extra pixels can be put to better use than on phones. The technology
could lead to Apple introducing a retina display for the iPad 3, though
there are serious practical issues to consider besides battery life and the
processing power needed to drive such high resolutions. First, all apps
would need to be revamped for an upgraded display. And one could question
the need for so many pixels in the first place—far more than needed for even
1080p video.

Samsung says it plans to have the PenTile screen commercially available
later this year.

Facebook's Sly-Dog Aspirations

One of these days we may see a real public clash between Facebook and Google
(Nasdaq: GOOG) - a huge bidding war, or maybe the launch of a real Google
social network that will have the other one fighting for its life. For now,
though, we get a silly little PR disaster that's left Facebook looking like
it's lost its Machiavellian mojo.

It just got caught up in a dirty tricks debacle in which it looked like it
was behind an effort to get influential bloggers to speak out against
Google's Social Circle system.

Facebook targeted Social Circle, also known as "Social Search," by hiring a
high-profile public relations firm, Burson-Marsteller. In particular,
Facebook doesn't like the way Social Circle uses Facebook data in its
service and thinks Social Circle is a threat to user privacy. Hearing that
last bit makes me think of a glass house for some reason, but whatever. That
much has been confirmed -- Facebook has acknowledged it hired
Burson-Marsteller to go after Social Circle.

But Facebook has denied it told the PR firm to go about it by doing what
it's accused of doing. Blogger Christopher Soghoian says he was
propositioned by Burson-Marsteller to have an opinion piece basically
ghostwritten for him. The firm has allegedly come on to a variety of
technology bloggers with the same idea.

They contacted opinionated and influential people, and in addition to giving
them a one-sided story they could investigate themselves, which is the
typical PR MO, they volunteered to "assist in the draft" -- just sit back
and leave the writing to them. They wouldn't initially disclose to Soghoian
who their client was.

I think I might have read something earlier this week from a blogger who
actually did take them up on it, though I can't remember who wrote it -- or
didn't write it, as the case may be.

But to paraphrase Soghoian's reaction: "Uh ... no." However, instead of just
moving on, he put Burson-Marsteller's email up on the Web for public
viewing.

What Burson-Marsteller is accused of doing is skeezy, and it smells a lot
like a smear campaign. Still, none of what was described above is illegal.
And there's no indication Facebook was making up outright false stories
about Google. In fact, the message it was trying to draw attention to was
consumer privacy protections -- and while Facebook has a pretty spotty
record itself in terms of privacy, that is an important issue.

And really, Facebook and Google expect nothing less than total war any day
now, so sneaky little tricks are just part of the game. But if you are going
to open that part of the playbook -- or hire a company that might go there
on your behalf -- it's probably best not to do so in a way that can be so
easily exposed.

Apple iPhone app developers hit by patent claims

A company is claiming to have a patent on Apple's in-app purchase system,
and has contacted at least five developers of iOS apps in the US and UK
demanding that they license it.

The move has worried app developers who are uncertain whether Apple will
cover any legal costs relating to their apps, even though they have used the
company's developer kit and associated tools to create the apps.

One claim was served on Friday by hand on James Thomson, a Glasgow-based
developer who wrote the apps PCalc and DragThing. Another who received the
couriered legal package was Matt Braun, a developer based in Toledo, Ohio,
author of the best-selling iPhone kids game MASH who runs a mobile app
development company, Magnate Interactive. Patrick McCarron of MobileAge,
based in Chicago, has also received a demand.

The claims come from a Texas-based company called Lodsys, which said it has
four patents relating to in-app purchases, interactive online ads, online
help and subscription renewals. They are cited on its website.

Lodsys is a patent licensing company for inventions developed by Dan Abelow,
a Harvard graduate who sold five of his patents outright in 2004: four went
to Lodsys and one to a company called Webvention.

Abelow told the Guardian that he has no knowledge of which companies have
licensed the patents. His site said the licensees of his patents include
Apple, Google, Microsoft and Nokia along with roughly 200 other companies.

"The concept of the Lodsys-owned patents predates the internet," Abelow told
the Guardian. "The idea was that if you're sitting and holding in your hand
a product and you use it, why shouldn't it be aware of your behaviour,
digitally, and conduct your needs to the vendor, who could interact with
you." He filed for the patent in 1992 and it was granted in 1999, making it
valid for at least another 15 years.

The Guardian attempted to contact Mark Small of Lodsys by phone and email,
without success, to seek an answer to whether Apple had ever licensed any of
the named patents, and what validity was claimed against the apps
developers.

A number of the developers, including Thomson, have referred the claims to
Apple's legal department, on the basis that they have built their apps using
Apple's developer toolkit.

Apple's iOS Paid Apps agreement says that developers will be reponsible for
"claims that any of the licensed applications and/or the end-user's
possession or use of those licensed applications infringes the copyright or
other intellectual property rights of any third party".

But it is seen as highly likely that Apple will fight Lodsys's claim,
because it would destabilise its App Store, which is an essential element in
maintaining the attraction of its iPhone.

The move is a worrying one for developers, and follows a similar filing at
the end of March by another Texas-based company, H-W Technology, which
asserted a patent on an "internet phone with search and advertising
capability".

Florian Mueller, who closely watches developents in smartphones and patent
claims, analysed the claims by H-W Technology and commented: "What's really
disconcerting about this lawsuit is that it's the first such lawsuit to
attack – besides operating system vendors and device makers, which are
routinely sued by patent holders – a number of companies because of their
smartphone apps. I'm really afraid we're now going to see more patent
lawsuits against application developers. Hopefully this won't ever affect
little guys who can't afford to defend themselves, but if there's a major
company behind an app, or if an app is commercially very successful, it can
happen and it has now apparently started to happen."

Google's Chromebooks to sell on high street?

Google's new 'Chromebook' computers could be sold on high streets soon,
despite the search giant's announcement that they will only be sold online.
Google announced that laptops made by Acer and Samsung would go on sale in
America, the UK and five other European countries from 15 June solely via
the web. UK partners were announced in San Francisco as PC World and Dixons'
websites and Amazon.co.uk.
A Samsung spokesman, however, said "We haven't announced our retail
partners yet. It would be great to sell the Chromebooks as widely as
possible if the consumer demand is there."
Although the Chromebook is a new type of computer that is aimed at the less
computer-savvy and is set to need some explanation in a crowded marketplace,
Google said that "these launch retail partners will provide users with
information and guidance to easily help them identify and purchase the right
Chromebook for them". The company added that "We've partnered with these
online retailers to get devices in to the hands of users as quickly and
easily as possible, but we're always looking at how best to serve our
customers".
Both Acer and Samsung models will run 'Chrome OS', a version of the Chrome
web browser that encourages people to meet all their computing needs via the
internet rather than with expensive, separate software. Samsung's will start
at £349; Acer prices have yet to be announced.

Sony chief haunted by dark shadow

In the autumn of his career, Sony's British-born chief executive is beset by
rivals and crises

Later this year, an army of men in tights will take on the forces of
darkness across the world's cinemas screens. And Sir Howard Stringer,
Welsh-born boss of media and electronics giant Sony, could really do with
the services of a superhero. Beset by a global hacking catastrophe unleashed
by unknown forces, he should be calling for the services of Spider-Man, a
hero who has pulled Sony out of trouble before. Instead, he's left pinning
his hopes on the Smurfs.

Hollywood is gearing up for a clash of the titans at the box office. Thor
has just opened; X-Men: First Class, Green Lantern and Captain America will
follow. But the next film in Sony's Spider-Man franchise won't be out until
2012; instead, Sony will enter the fray this year with a 3D cartoon based on
a team of diminutive blue-skinned adventurers from 1980s TV.
Hollywood-watchers are expecting it to bomb. But even if it does, it will be
the least of the 69-year-old's problems.

Advertisement: Story continues below

Hackers have accessed an estimated 100 million accounts on the Sony's online
gaming networks. It's one of the worst internet break-ins of all time -
analysts say it could cost Sony up to $US24b - and comes as Sony has striven
to put its PlayStation games console at the centre of plans for a digital
future.

The villains, according to Sony, left a taunting message: "We are legion" -
a line used by the loose affiliation of hackers known as Anonymous. But
Anonymous claims it is being framed: the collective targeted Sony after it
started legal action against ace hacker George Hotz, but it has never been
associated with credit card theft.

Sony trotted out Kazuo Hirai, Stringer's heir apparent, to deliver Sony's
official mea culpa. "We apologise deeply for causing great unease and
trouble to our users," he told a press conference, bowing in shame. Then
yesterday on 6 May, in a blogpost, Stringer himself finally apologised for
the "inconvenience and concern" caused by the breach.

The Sony boss also acknowledged criticism that the company had been slow in
alerting its customers to the hack attack; a full week elapsed between Sony
uncovering unusual activity in its systems and notifying users. Stringer
said: "I wish we could have gotten the answers we needed sooner, but
forensic analysis is a complex, time-consuming process. Hackers, after all,
do their best to cover their tracks."

It is six years since Stringer became Sony's first non-Japanese chief
executive. The curly-haired Welshman doesn't speak the language - he argues
that it's too hard to learn at his age - and took over a high-profile job in
a country whose corporate culture is sometimes accused of being xenophobic.
But he was the first choice of Nobuyuki Idei, then Sony's chairman, who had
shaken up the Japanese giant and was determined to bring in more outsiders.

The appointment was the highlight of a remarkable career. Stringer was born
in Cardiff, Wales, his father a sergeant in the RAF (British air force), his
mother a schoolteacher. The family moved to Aylesbury, north of London when
he was a small boy and he won a scholarship to private school before
studying modern history at Oxford University. His studies confirmed him as a
lifelong liberal and in 1965 Stringer moved to New York, inspired by stories
of the civil rights movement and John F Kennedy.

He had just cashed his second paycheck as a clerk at CBS Radio when he was
drafted to Vietnam. Instead of catching a plane back to Britain, he went to
war, spending two years in the army and being decorated for valour.

After Vietnam he returned to CBS, rising through the ranks to become
president and winning nine Emmys, including one for The CIA's Secret Army,
an expose of the US's undercover war against Cuba's Fidel Castro after the
Bay of Pigs. Stringer's mix of charm and hard work made him one of the
hottest media executives in the US.

Idei picked Stringer for Sony in 1997 after the latter had left CBS for a
brief stint at the head of an ill-fated venture called Tele-TV. He was
always going to stand out in Japan, but he was culturally adept in an
unfamiliar environment, and was quick to introduce colleagues to the
delights of Welsh golf courses.

Stringer can be blunt too - an unusual trait in Japanese corporate culture.
He was in the running for director-general of the BBC at the end of the
1990s and during one interview someone asked him if he was a little too old
for the job. "I'm only six weeks older than I was when you asked me to
apply," Stringer replied.

Unafraid to shake things up, he has slashed jobs at Sony, ousted
high-profile executives and brought in more outsiders. But for all
Stringer's charm and ruthlessness, Sony is far from the innovative
powerhouse it once was. Apple dominates digital music. Amazon's Kindle is
beating Sony's Reader. LG, Samsung and Vizio have proved tough competition
in HD TVs. The entire music business is suffering, and while film has been a
good business for the company, this summer looks patchy at best.

PlayStation, too, faced stiff competition from Nintendo's Wii and
Microsoft's Xbox, but it has been a bright spot for the company's digital
strategy. There are 50 million PlayStation 3s around the world, all capable
of accessing a world of online content as well as playing games. Indeed, it
was starting to look like Sony's Trojan horse, a way to take the digital
fight back to Apple and its rivals - but the hacking scandal has cast a dark
shadow over those plans.

For years, Stringer has talked about returning to Britain. His family live
in Oxfordshire, north west of London, and the Sony boss spends his time
flying between there, New York and Tokyo. A welcome in the hillsides must
look more tempting than ever now. Having risen in the west, perhaps
Stringer's long American odyssey is finally setting in the east.

Google begins war against Windows

Google does battle with Microsoft in most of its business areas, but it's gearing up to tackle the big daddy of them all: Windows.

With Windows -- and Macs and other PC operating systems -- Google sees an inefficient, costly, and decidedly 20th century mode of computing. Data is stored on each PC's hard drive, so if a laptop is lost or damaged, all the data stored on it could be gone forever too. And when PCs break, they're expensive and time-consuming to fix.

That's especially true in the corporate world. Gartner estimates that each desktop in a corporation costs between $3,000 and $5,000 per year to manage. Laptops can cost even more.

Ironically, all that spending means offices end up with old, rickety computers that the users would never buy for themselves. The high cost of tech support makes it prohibitively expensive for many companies to keep their hardware and software up to date. Services firm NetApplications says that more than 50% of computers are still using Windows XP -- a 10-year-old operating system.

Google's (GOOG, Fortune 500) solution: Chrome OS, a Web-based operating system that is set for release on June 15.

On computers running Chrome OS, all of a user's information is stored in the cloud, in remote servers controlled by Google or other companies. Instead of a desktop software model, which relies on installed apps like Microsoft (MSFT, Fortune 500) Outlook and Word, customers will use on Gmail or another Web mail program, and Google Docs or Office 365, which exist online only. (Yes, you can run Microsoft's cloud Office software on a Google Chrome device.)

That goes for IT departments too. Intricate administrative software is replaced by a Web page that allows tech staff to manage all Chrome OS PCs. And Chrome OS automatically updates with the newest version, saving businesses from spending a fortune deploying new software versions.

"We're venturing into a really new model of computing," Sergey Brin, Google's co-founder, said at a press conference this week. "This head-to-toe software model eliminates a lot of complexity. Complexity is torturing everyone, and that's a flawed model."

Google believes it can save businesses at least 50% on their desktop support expenses if they switch to Chrome OS.

But Google has a long, long uphill battle to fight against the entrenched corporate behemoth that is Microsoft Windows. More than 90% of the world's computers run Windows.

Not every business is ready to simplify its hardware, since many rely on high-end software that does not yet exist as a Web application. And Google has had a shaky relationship with the enterprise in the past, gaining only tepid support for its cloud-based business applications suite.

Also, this has been tried before with practically zero success.

Nearly 20 years ago, Oracle CEO Larry Ellison predicted that "thin client," hard-drive-less desktops connected to and managed by a server would be the future of business computing. Sun Microsystems -- now owned by Oracle (ORCL, Fortune 500) -- also tried and failed to get businesses to adopt thin clients.

Google acknowledged past failures but says that this time, it's different. The company surveyed 400 businesses of all sizes and found that 75% said they could migrate to Chrome OS.

People are now more accustomed to running applications out of a browser, Google executives say. The company partnered with virtualization giant Citrix to allow Chrome OS computers to run Windows applications hosted in the cloud, letting businesses run Adobe (ADBE) Photoshop, for instance, on Chrome OS.

Also, unlike pervious attempts, Google is providing both the operating system and the computer as one package: For $28 per user per month ($20 for government offices and schools), companies can rent "Chromebook" netbooks from Google and get support included.

"For the first time, hardware and software are being packaged together as a service," said Sundar Pichai, Google's senior vice president of Chrome. "We think this can fundamentally change the way people use computing in companies."

As evidence that companies of any size can deploy Chrome OS, Google itself is in the process of switching over to the new operating system.

"We will be deploying them increasingly internally," Brin said. "I hope to report next year that we have a very small percentage of anything other than Chromebooks at Google."

Google thinks it can change the face of computing. The only obstacles: The world's largest software maker, notoriously stubborn IT departments and decades of history going against it.

It's a good thing Google likes a challenge. To top of page